| Flower photography
certainly isn't rocket-science, however, it does require
a series of simple steps and guidelines to ensure that
you will capture the best possible shot.
You will definitely need a sturdy tripod, a shutter-release
cord, and a quality tack sharp lens. Plus there's
the optimal shooting conditions to think about. The
correct lighting, a calm weather situation, good composition,
and of course having a great looking subject matter.
OK, let's take a look at these elements individually
in a bit more detail.
A sturdy tripod is an absolute must
here simply to eliminate camera shake and to assist
in obtaining a great composition. It's just not possible
to capture the greater 'depth of field' (DOF) required
without one. The larger flowers such as roses, hydrangeas,
rhododendrons, dahlias, magnolias (and also many tropicals),
etc., all have very deep blooms which need a small
aperture setting (ie: f/22) in order to get a high
quality shot with a lot of critical detail right across
the entire plant.
A
tripod that has a horizontal arm feature is also extremely
useful. I use the Manfrotto
055XPROB
model which has a unique center column that can be
quickly swung around into the horizontal position
without removing it. This rather nifty ergonomic function
is really simple to use and allows me to get right
over a flower and take those close up shots with ease.
Also, with regard to composition, a tripod allows
the photographer to take their time, carefully assess
the scene, step back, relax and comfortably make those
necessary small adjustments needed to create the very
best shot.
Today, I would not even consider taking a flower
photograph without using a tripod.
Using a high quality (pro) lens
does make a difference. Yes, I realize that today's
consumer grade lenses do take good pictures. However,
when you hit that sweet-spot and get all the various
elements right, using a professional level piece of
glass will just make your pictures that much better,
especially with regard to flower or plant photography
which often involves a lot of critical detail that
needs to be very sharp.
I
personally use the Nikon
17-55mm f/2.8 DX Lens
which is very sharp throughout the range and also
allows me to get pretty darn close - enough for 99%
of the shots that I want.
Please Note* - most close up flower
pics are considered just that 'close up' they are
not macro shots which would require a proper 1:1 (or
2:1) ratio macro lens. Regular flower photography
isn't macro - unless one is shooting extremely near
to the plant, ie: the stamens or centers, etc.
As mentioned in my flower
passion - part 2 blog I think of flower shots
being very similar to portraits. So, with that in
mind I would recommend using either a 17-55mm or 24-70mm
zoom lens which will give you the digital equivalent
of the older 'traditional' portrait 85mm to 110mm
focal range in the film era days. Today's small pro
zooms offer great build quality, good functionality,
and the focal length flexibility that you need for
this kind of project.
The
next piece of equipment that I think is essential
is the shutter-release cord which
simply enables the photographer to be completely hands-off
camera when taking the shot. This is the 2nd step
in assuring that an absolute minimum amount of shake
is present. I use the NIKON
MC-36 that allows me to put all my focus &
attention into the shot at hand and not have to even
think about touching my D300 when the shutter is fired.
Not only does this totally minimize any possible camera
movement, but once again, helps me to relax, compose
the frame, and affords a far more comfortable overall
shooting experience. Also, if any slight 'breeze'
does happen to be a factor...it's far easier to release
the shutter using the MC36 at just the right moment
- than it would be by actually pressing the camera
button with a finger. Plus, this type of unit also
has all the usual "timer" related functionality
and can be programmed to operate as a full intervalometer
if desired.
There are quite a number of shutter-release models
on the market these days so finding one to fit your
camera and meet your needs shouldn't be a problem.
Now onto shooting conditions, which
like anything else cannot be rushed and needs to be
at an optimum.
First off, the weather has to be
just right, and this is where patience really is the
key. Don't be easily tempted into taking pictures
when the conditions are not at their best. You can
always come back another day, and plan ahead to get
the best possible shot. The wind is the most annoying
factor by far, and even the slightest breeze can ruin
a potentially great photograph. Calm, windless conditions
will of course create the best results.
Sometimes I have gone back to that same location
3 or 4 days in a row just to shoot a particular flower
when the local thermal currents have proven to be
too strong. Often small micro-climates will exist
and it can be quite still when leaving the house but
later on full of little wind tunnels when you arrive
at the scene. Delicate, or tiny flowers will need
extra attention in this regard. Even larger plants
tend to gently sway, back and forth in a very light
wind. Not noticeable, until you actually start to
get down to business.
As a rule I usually find that mid-mornings are generally
more calm and tranquil than during the afternoon.
This will naturally vary depending upon your own specific
location, etc - however, having lived in many different
places I've found this to be a common theme. I also
prefer the 'light' at this time of day, it's more
gentle, softer, but new and alive, as apposed to a
'waining' or diminishing type of light, experienced
later on, towards the end of the day.
So, this brings us onto lighting conditions
which, in turn can make or break a photograph. As
shooting flowers is mostly an outdoors based scenario
- then this is also closely related to the weather
aspect. The best situation is to shoot flowers on
a bright, but cloudy day. A partial sun/cloud mix
is OK too, so long as there is no direct sunlight
falling upon the flower itself, or in close proximity
to it, ie: creating a harsh looking background, etc.
IF I had to choose between the two I would always
pick the bright cloudy option, simply
because it has a better overall contrast/luminosity
balance. Shooting in the shade (to avoid direct sunlight)
on a sunny day can often produce a strong shadow effect,
and/or a diminished color representation.
I know it's a very natural emotional reaction to
WANT to take pictures on a lovely sunny day. However,
in reality ole Mother Nature didn't have our photography
in mind when she came up with the flowers and sunshine
combination. Unfortunately, they just don't jive together
very well.
Direct sunlight will always create a harsh shooting
environment. Colors become washed-out with a high
saturation loss, foliage& flora in general will
look faded, burnt, streaked and very unappealing.
So, again be patient - do yourself a big favor and
wait for the right weather & light conditions,
it will make all the difference to the final result.
Your pictures will look so much richer and better
for it. Plus, it will be much easier to prevent any
over-exposure problems, or blow-outs, etc.
What's the rush - right? :-) |